My View: Lessons from Christchurch to Portland
The mass murder of parishioners at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, is both a tragedy for victims and their families who were mercilessly attacked by the self-avowed "white power" shooter, and demonstrates the need to fight white supremacist terrorism globally.
We need effective gun control laws from Salem to Washington, D.C., to Christchurch, half a world away.
What then must we do? This requires asking fundamental questions.
First, are elders and seniors who are regular churchgoers — from Charleston's African American church to Pittsburgh's Tree of Life Synagogue, and now to the two mosques in Christchurch — "inviting soft targets" for those men who have a cache of assault rifles, high-caliber magazines and white supremacy ideology?
Elders and seniors who are churchgoers appear to be both "soft targets" and folks who believe in hopeful values like community, volunteering and love.
Second, some national commentators insist a fair-to-middling "solution" is twofold: better mental health practices and services, and more regulation of hate speech on the internet's so-called "dark web." Good ideas, but good ideas that miss the point.
As soon as 50 people were killed at two Christchurch mosques, Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand prime minister, was adamant that what her country needs — and will legalize now — are stringent, specific gun control laws.
In Salem and in Washington, D.C., what we need is a ban on assault weapons and on high-capacity magazines. If we think about the mechanics of active shooter mass murders (the Las Vegas massacre, the Pulse nightclub massacre in Florida, Parkland, Sandy Hook, Columbine ... along with the church, mosque and synagogue shootings) none of these events could have been accomplished with a knife, a bow and arrow, or simple hand-to-hand combat.
There is no "rational" reason for people to have AR-15 assault rifles or high-capacity magazines. These are military weapons, unsuitable for rabbit hunting, boar hunting, any sort of "recreational" hunting, or for home protection.
Yet, Donald Trump's single largest corporate donation in the 2016 campaign was $30 million from Oliver North's NRA, the National Rifle Association. Trump's real "wall" isn't about the border with Mexico. Trump's real wall is to block effective gun control in Congress. Among industrialized countries, only Estados Unidos has this preventable problem of mass shootings, time and time again.
Here in Oregon, our state Legislature has bills before it now to ban assault weapons and ban high-capacity magazines. With a supermajority by Oregon Democrats, both proposals may finally pass. The NRA, of course, has a history of challenging in the courts such new laws.
Congress, as we know, is another kettle of fish. Congress will near-unanimously pass anti-hate resolutions, but not pass sensible gun safety laws. The Brady Campaign, Moms Demand Action, Gabi and Mark Giffords, Sandy Hook Promise and their allies so far have not devised a strategy to counter NRA dominance. New Zealand, under prime minister Jacinda Ardern, is now taking this important step.
The future is at stake for elders and seniors here in the Northwest and globally. Elder churchgoers need to pray and practice their faith in safety, and not be viewed as "collateral damage" through the lens of Second Amendment idolatry.
For the future, for young and old alike, our public spaces need to be safe for use by folks in our communities. Too often, the "future" is cut short by men with guns. Public officials and leaders — from John Kennedy to Martin Luther King Jr., from Abraham Lincoln to Mahatma Gandhi to Harvey Milk — have been assassinated via gun violence.
Quality local journalism takes time and money, which comes, in part, from paying readers. If you enjoy articles like this one, please consider supporting us.
(It costs just a few cents a day.)